VERSION 040520.3 of "Perfidy" in eight segments, with 68 photos, Bush documents, OKC95 documents, approx. 20 pp. each download; donations welcome. It's a lot of work.
Support the Truth About the History of Satanism in Politics -- Globalists' Use of Distractions and Dialectics to Confuse Issues
| Here's the deal on this book. This series of nine sections is the book broken down into time periods, smaller so it can be printed in sections. In the File Menu, choose Print Preview, to pagenate the file and then print out as few or as many pages as you desire, at a time; there are about 180 pages--for the cost of paper and ink. --Chaiyah | ![]() |
Please >>donate in return for the downloads you take--CLICK a Box. Thank you for stopping by. Next time, bring a friend. : ) Chaiyah
|
or |
||||
Why did Congress Let Things Be Set Up This Way? Are They Stupid?
This is a summary report on those elements of that clandes tine organizational network, (which we shall label the Shadow Government), which serves as a kind of "parallel government" to the official elected and appointed government of this country. It includes those elements known to the author with sufficient certainty that they can be positively identified, and their known or reliably reported functions described. It is distinctly possible that there are other elements, (particularly in the realms of the "Bla ck Budget" and "Spec ial Opera tions",) which have eluded our study, and are not named here.
Just as with the official government, the Shad ow Government has functional branches. However, unlike the official government, the purpose of the none-executive branches of the Shadow Government is simply to distribute various functions, but not to achieve a system of checks and balances, as was supposed to happen consti tutionally between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. Government. That is because the Shadow Government is a creature of a powerful eli te, who need not fear being dominated by an instrument of their own creation.
In the Shadow Government five branches may be identified. These branches are:
The reporting lines of the Intellig ence Branch and the War Department to the Executive Branch are straightforward and obvious. Int elligence exists to provide the Executive Branch with sufficient necessary information to make adequately informed policy decisions. The War Department exists to provide coerc ive force to carry out Executive policy decisions which could meet with public resi stance. The Sp ecial Operations units within the Intelligence Branch and War Department exist to carry out policy directives requiring co vert action and official denia bility.
The Weapons Industry Branch reports to the Executive Branch most often indirectly, through the War Department and/or the Int elligence Branch (for Bla ck Budget wea pons systems).
The Financial Department theoretically reports to the Executive Branch for fiscal policy implementation, but de facto also reports directly to the international power brokers who have created the Shadow Government. The Financial Department serves at times directly as their instrument of fiscal policy imp lementation.
An analysis of the overall purposes of these five branches suggests that the overall purpose of the Shadow Government is to exercise covert control by:
All of these mechanisms of control serve to preserve or advance the agenda of an international group of pivotal power and influence brokers. That agen da is, according to Senator Barry Goldwater, that "national boundaries should be obliterated and one world rule established." [With No Apologies, Berkley Books, New York [[date unknown]].]
These power brokers' most visible unifying instrumental ity is the Counc il on Fore ign Relations (CFR), (which promotes the transition of Earth from a cluster of Nation-States to one glo bal government), [Chairman: Peter G. Pe terson; headquarters: 58 E. 68th Street, New York, NY 10021]. [Cf. In Control, Kerrville, TX: Fund to Restore an Educated Elec torate, 1993.]
However, one must not underestimate the influence of the Tri lateral Commission (TC), (which coordinates economic initiatives of the Group of S even with other "developed countries" vis-a-vis the "underdeveloped world",) [Chairman: Paul Vol cker; headquarters: 345 E. 46th Street, New York, NY 10017].
Neither should one misjudge the power of the secretive Bild erberg Group (BG), (which concentrates on the military and stra tegic considerations of powerful West European and North American power brokers), [chair rotates, former Chair: Prin ce Bernhard of Holland; headquarters unknown: annual meetings rotate, but originally were held at the Hotel de Bil derberg, Oosterbeck, Holland].
David Rock efeller is the Chairman Emeritus of both the C F R and the TC, and certainly influences, through proxy representatives (such as Lloyd Bent sen), the Bilder berg Group. [Cf. Holly Sklar, ed., Trilater alism: The Tr ilateral Commission and E lite Planning for World Management; Boston: South End Press, 1981.]
What follows is a succinct identification and description of the constituent agencies in each of the five branches of the Shad ow Government.
EXECUTIVE BRANCH -- (This branch contains the effective policymaking and controlling structures behind the veil of apparent, democratic governmental structures):
INTELLIGENCE BRANCH -- (Serves functions of domestic and international surveilla nce and of secret police/enforcers):
WAR DEPART MENT -- (High Technology Weap ons Development and Co vert Spec ial Forces/Spec ial Opera tions Units Deploy ment):
WEAPONS INDUSTRY BRANCH -- ("private" [black project] weap ons and co vert operations contractors):
FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT -- (Extra-Constitutional funding):
What conclusions can be drawn from this preliminary analysis of the structure, functions and operations of the Shadow Government? First, the Shadow Government is a very large, well-organized, skillfully camouflaged, parallel power structure. History suggests that it has served its masters well, and that its predilection for operating out of sight and notoriety, if not in an outright clandestine fashion, is exactly how its masters want it to function -- not drawing attention to itself, manipulating power behind the scenes, and accomplishing by covert operations what cannot lawfully or politically be accomplished out in the open.
What should be the attitude of the informed citizen to the Shadow Government?
Since it thrives in the dark, we should shine the light of full disclosure on it. Citizens can demand:
We founded this Country; it's time to take it back. -~- Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D. /P>
http://hardtruth.topcities.com/shadow_government.htm
http://slate.msn.com/id/2100014/
By William Saletan Wednesday, May 5, 2004, at 7:54 PM PT
"It's very important for people, your listeners, to understand in our country that when an issue is brought to our attention on this magnitude, we act-and we act in a way where leaders are willing to discuss it with the media. And we act in a way where, you know, our Congress asks pointed questions to the leadership. . Iraq was a unique situation because Saddam Hussein had constantly defied the world and had threatened his neighbors, had used weapons of mass destruction, had terrorist ties, had torture chambers ."-Bush, interview with Al Arabiya Television, May 5, 2004
"I'm not a lawyer. My impression is that what has been charged thus far is abuse, which I believe technically is different from torture. . I don't know if it is correct to say what you just said, that torture has taken place, or that there's been a conviction for torture. And therefore I'm not going to address the torture word."-Rumsfeld, Defense Department Operational Update Briefing, May 4, 2004
"Because we acted, torture rooms are closed, rape rooms no longer exist, mass graves are no longer a possibility in Iraq."-Bush, remarks at "Ask President Bush" event, Michigan, May 3, 2004
"A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba . listed some of the wrongdoing: 'Breaking chemical lights and pouring the phosphoric liquid on detainees; pouring cold water on naked detainees; beating detainees with a broom handle and a chair; threatening male detainees with rape; allowing a military police guard to stitch the wound of a detainee who was injured after being slammed against the wall in his cell; sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broom stick, and using military working dogs to frighten and intimidate detainees with threats of attack, and in one instance actually biting a detainee.' "-Seymour M. Hersh, "Torture at Abu Ghraib," The New Yorker, posted April 30, 2004
"There are those who seek to derail the transition to democracy because they want to return to the days of mass graves and torture chambers and rape rooms. But that's not going to happen."-McClellan, White House press briefing, April 30, 2004
"A year ago, I did give the speech from the carrier, saying that we had achieved an important objective, that we'd accomplished a mission, which was the removal of Saddam Hussein. And as a result, there are no longer torture chambers or rape rooms or mass graves in Iraq."-Bush, remarks in the Rose Garden, April 30, 2004
"The pictures show Americans, men and women, in military uniforms, posing with naked Iraqi prisoners. There are shots of the prisoners stacked in a pyramid, one with a slur written on his skin in English. In some, the male prisoners are positioned to simulate sex with each other. And in most of the pictures, the Americans are laughing, posing, pointing, or giving the camera a thumbs-up."-Dan Rather, 60 Minutes II, April 28, 2004
"We acted, and there are no longer mass graves and torture rooms and rape rooms in Iraq."-Bush, remarks at Victory 2004 Reception, Florida, April 23, 2004
"We're facing supporters of the outlaw cleric, remnants of Saddam's regime that are still bitter that they don't have the position to run the torture chambers and rape rooms. . They will fail because they do not speak for the vast majority of Iraqis who do not want to replace one tyrant with another. They will fail because the will of our coalition is strong. They will fail because America leads a coalition full of the finest military men and women in the world."-Bush, remarks on the USA Patriot Act, Pennsylvania, April 19, 2004
"Our military is . performing brilliantly. See, the transition from torture chambers and rape rooms and mass graves and fear of authority is a tough transition. And they're doing the good work of keeping this country stabilized as a political process unfolds."-Bush, remarks on "Tax Relief and the Economy," Iowa, April 15, 2004
"The investigation started after SPC Darby . got a CD from CPL Graner. . He came across pictures of naked detainees."-Testimony of Special Agent Scott Bobeck, Army Criminal Investigation Division, same hearing, April 9, 2004
"SFC Snider grabbed my prisoner and threw him into a pile. .. I saw SSG Frederic, SGT Davis and CPL Graner walking around the pile hitting the prisoners. I remember SSG Frederick hitting one prisoner in the side of its [sic] ribcage. The prisoner was no danger to SSG Frederick. . I saw two naked detainees, one masturbating to another kneeling with its mouth open."-Testimony of Military Police Specialist Matthew Wisdom, hearing on charges of prisoner abuse, April 9, 2004; according to The New Yorker, "After the hearing, the presiding investigative officer ruled that there was sufficient evidence to convene a court-martial."
"Correspondent Brooke Hart: But in a 53-page secret report, Army Major General Antonio Taguba says an investigation found a disturbing pattern of sadistic, blatant, wanton criminal abuses. The report was completed in February, but the Pentagon said Defense Secretary Rumsfeld hadn't read it. Democratic lawmakers are frustrated. Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M.: This is an unacceptable response. That's not the level of concern the American people would expect of their military commanders for this type of conduct."-- "Pentagon officials to answer tough questions from the Senate Armed Services Committee regarding Iraqi prisoner abuse," CNBC, April 4, 2004
"As you know, on 14 January 2004, a criminal investigation was initiated to examine allegations of detainee abuse at the Baghdad confinement facility at Abu Ghraib. Shortly thereafter, the commanding general of Combined Joint Task Force Seven requested a separate administrative investigation into systemic issues such as command policies and internal procedures related to detention operations. That administrative investigation is complete; however, the findings and recommendations have not been approved. As a result of the criminal investigation, six military personnel have been charged with criminal offenses to include conspiracy, dereliction of duty, cruelty and maltreatment, assault, and indecent acts with another." --Brigadier Gen. Mark Kimmitt, Deputy Director for Coalition Operations, Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, March 20, 2004
"There are no more rape rooms and torture chambers in Iraq."-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, CBS Early Show, March 19, 2004
"There's still remnants of that regime that would like to take it back. . They could torture people and have rape rooms, and the world would turn their head from that and let it happen. But they can't do that anymore."-- Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, BBC interview, March 16, 2004
"Every woman in Iraq is better off because the rape rooms and torture chambers of Saddam Hussein are forever closed."-Bush, remarks on "Efforts to Globally Promote Women's Human Rights," March 12, 2004
"On 19 January 2004, Lieutenant General (LTG) Ricardo S. Sanchez, Commander, Combined Joint Task Force Seven (CJTF-7) requested that the Commander, US Central Command, appoint an Investigating Officer (IO) in the grade of Major General (MG) or above to investigate the conduct of operations within the 800th Military Police (MP) Brigade. LTG Sanchez requested an investigation of detention and internment operations by the Brigade from 1 November 2003 to present. LTG Sanchez cited recent reports of detainee abuse."-Report by Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba to Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, senior U.S. military official in Iraq, describing a formal inquiry launched on Jan. 19, 2004
"Sources have revealed new details from the Army's criminal investigation into reports of abuse of Iraqi detainees, including the location of the suspected crimes and evidence that is being sought. U.S. soldiers reportedly posed for photographs with partially unclothed Iraqi prisoners, a Pentagon official told CNN on Tuesday."-Barbara Starr, CNN, Jan. 21, 2004
"Saddam Hussein now sits in a prison cell, and Iraqi men and women are no longer carried to torture chambers and rape rooms ."-Bush, remarks on "Winston Churchill and the War on Terror," Feb. 4, 2004
"Seventeen U.S. soldiers have been suspended of duties pending the outcome of the investigation into alleged allegations of abuse of Iraqi prisoners, a U.S. officer said Monday."-Associated Press, Feb. 23, 2004
"[B]etween October and December 2003, at the Abu Ghraib Confinement Facility (BCCF), numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses were inflicted on several detainees. This systemic and illegal abuse of detainees was intentionally perpetrated by several members of the military police guard force. . The allegations of abuse were substantiated by detailed witness statements (ANNEX 26) and the discovery of extremely graphic photographic evidence. . I find that the intentional abuse of detainees by military police personnel included the following acts:
These findings are amply supported by written confessions provided by several of the suspects, written statements provided by detainees, and witness statements.
In addition, several detainees also described the following acts of abuse, which under the circumstances, I find credible based on the clarity of their statements and supporting evidence provided by other witnesses (ANNEX 26):
Executive summary of Taguba report, finalized Feb. 29, 2004, briefed to superiors on March 3, 2004, and submitted in final form on March 9, 2004
"One thing is for certain: There won't be any more mass graves and torture rooms and rape rooms."-Bush, press availability in Monterrey, Mexico, Jan. 12, 2004
"There was an announcement by the Iraqi Governing Council earlier this week about the tribunal that they have set up to hold accountable members of the former regime who were responsible for three decades of brutality and atrocities. . We know about the mass graves and the rape rooms and the torture chambers of Saddam Hussein's regime. . We welcome their decision to move forward on a tribunal to hold people accountable for those atrocities."-Bush Press Secretary Scott McClellan, White House press briefing, Dec. 10, 2003
"Iraq is free of rape rooms and torture chambers."-President Bush, remarks to 2003 Republican National Committee Presidential Gala, Oct. 8, 2003
"The Iraqi people are now free. And they do not have to worry about the secret police coming after them in the middle of the night, and they don't have to worry about their husbands and brothers being taken off and shot, or their wives being taken to rape rooms. Those days are over."-Paul Bremer, Administrator, [Iraq] Coalition Provisional Authority, Sept. 2, 2003
Take a look at what we have done to these and our own people.

There's just one problem with the official story of Sept 11 - it isn't true.
This article presents a summary of the evidence that entire event was planned and carried out by the US govt and its agencies. The nature of a printed article means that references for the research which backs up the following information can't be included here. However - unlike the mainstream media -which never provides any sources that one can verify - all of the information below is based upon meticulously researched and referenced material that can be sent via email to any who wish to view it. I encourage readers who have email to request the material , by emailing holmgren@nettrade.com.au or viewing it at http://thewebfairy.com/911closeup - because I never expect anybody to believe unsourced hearsay, and I don't make public claims unless I can back them up with solid sources.
To start with, lets assume that the official story is basically true - that 19 Arabs hijacked four planes and crashed three of them into buildings and one into a field. As I'll demonstate later, this is not what happened ,but even if it were true, there is solid proof that the govt must have had prior knowledge and deliberately allowed it to happen. In order to understand this proof, one must first know the basics of the official story.
American Airlines flight 11, a Boeing 767, tail number N334AA, with 92 people aboard,including the hijackers, was hijacked by 5 Arabs, while on route from Boston to LA. It was known to be hijacked by 8.25 AM or earlier, and hit the Nth tower of the WTC at 8.46. United Airlines flight 175, a Boeing 767, tail number N612UA, with 65 aboard , including the hijackers , was hijacked by 5 Arabs, while flying the same route as AA 11. It was known to be hijacked at about 8.55 AM and hit the Sth Tower of the WTC at 9.03.
The towers later collapsed due to fire and /or impact damage. American Airlines flight 77, a Boeing 757, tail number N644AA, with 64 aboard, including the hijackers, was hijacked by 5 Arabs while on route from Dulles airport (DC) to LA. It was known to be hijacked at about 8.55 and hit the Pentagon at 9.45.
United Airlines flight 93, a Boeing 757, tail number N591UA, with 45 aboard, including the hijackers, on route from Newark (New Jersey) to SF , was hijacked by 4 Arabs. It was known to be hijacked about 9.45, and crashed in PA at 10.10.
The incriminating anomaly in this timeline is that the US airforce did not scramble a single fighter jet to interecept any of the hijacked planes. A little research into aviation regulations and historical precedent demonstrates that every one of those planes should have been intercepted by jet fighters before it got anywhere near its crash destination.The failure to launch any intercepts is only explainable by a systematic nation-wide stand down of routine air defence proceedures. FAA regulations state that if any plane deviates from its flight path, and fails to repsond to ATC commands or communications, it is automatically declared an emergency. This is because is it has become a hazard to other planes - even if no malicious intent is suspected. If ATC is any doubt as to whether an emergency exists, it it is to be considered as one.
Once ATC has detected an emergency, a request is put through to NORAD for an escort of fighter jets to intercept the plane, investigate the problem, and guide it back to its correct course, via a set of clearly stated proceedures. Should the pilot prove unco-operative, the regulations provide the fighter pilots with a graduated range of more aggressive responses, such as firing warning tracers, flying one each side, to force it into the desired flight path - or even shooting down in extreme circumstances. The fighter jets are either scrambled from nearby air bases or else by diverting pilots on training flights to the intercept. It takes only a few minutes to scramble fighter jets, and the process is so routine that in the year leading up to Sept 11, there was an average of 1.6 such incidents weekly across the US. A study of the location of air bases in relation to the flight paths of the hijacked planes, indicates that every plane should have been interecepted before impact. And yet nothing was even scrambled until after the Pentagon was hit.
PENTAGON-moment-of-impact caught by a passing motorist. Where's the 757?
The most spectacualr example is that of the Pentagon strike. Two planes had already hit the WTC by 9.03 and yet this plane was allowed to fly for another 42 minutes, off course towards Washington, untroubled by the world's most powerful air force. Only 10 miles from the Pentagon is Andrews Airbase, a huge installation which is repsonsible for air defence around the DC area, and maintains two squadrons of fighter jets on permanent standby for this very purpose, since the security of the White House, State dept, Capitol and the City of DC are also at stake. This was not an unforseen contingency. The Pentagon had twice in the last two years conducted drills specifically simulating a plane strike, and for decades, US security services had been wrestling with the potential problem of a hijacked airliner taking a suicide plunge into the Whitehouse.
On sept 11, they had nearly an hours warning of the Pentagon attack - and grounded the entire airforce - in violation of standard operating procedures that are automatically implemented even in the case of a single plane accidentally deviating from its course with no obviously hostile intent.
On Sept 14, NORAD, after initially admitting that it failed to scramble anything - supposedly because it simply hadn't imagined such a situation - suddenly changed the story, claiming that it had scrambled fighters from Langely air-base - 130 miles away - but they didn't get there in time. If fighters were really scrambled from Langely, then how could NORAD - which issues the scramble order - have been unaware of it until 3 days later? And according to the times given by NORAD on Sept 14, they would have had to flown at less than 260 mph to have not got there in time - when the top speed of the fighters is about 1200mph. And why scramble from Langely, when Andrews had two squadrons just 10 miles away - specifically dedicated to the DC area? Then they tried to say that no fighters were available at Andrews that day, but failed to explain how the non existant fighters then miraculously appeared at Andrews to take to the skies a few minutes after the Pentagon was hit, to start flying protective cover over DC - while still not bothering to chase UA 93, which was supposedly heading for the WhiteHouse by this time. While the air force was doing nothing, the two officials most directly responsible for defence of the nation - Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff , General Richard Myers and President/Commander in Chief, Geroge W. Bush were displaying what can only be described as cavalier indifference to the horror that was unfolding. Myers was about to start a routine meeting with Senator Max Cleland when he heard that a plane had hit the WTC. He went ahead with the meeting as if nothing had happened.
Eighteen minutes later, when the second plane hit, and NORAD knew that at least one more plane was hijacked, Myers and Cleland continued with the meeting. Then a plane hit the Pentagon. And still they chatted on about routine matters. Meanwhile, Bush was in Flordia, about to make a televised photo opportunity trip to an elementary school, to listen to second graders read, after which he was to give a speech about the reading program. Before he even got to the school, he knew about the first WTC crash, but continued with his arrangement. And then, still, before he arrived at the school, NORAD knew about two more hijackings,which means that Bush knew, but he continued to the school anyway - in spite of that fact that the school was only 5 miles from an international airport , and his movements were public knowledge in advance, which means that the school might have been a target - and then he pretended to know nothing about the attacks when he got there. Before he went into the classroom, it would have been clear to NORAD that a major terrorist attack was underway.
By 9.05 Bush was listening to a little girl read a story about her pet goat, and his Chief of staff, Andrew card came into the classroom and whispered in his ear that a second plane had hit the WTC and that "America was under attack." Bush nodded casually and continued with the reading class - for another 25 minutes, smiling ,joking and cheering about the reading skills of the children. A reporter who suggested that he should be addressing himself to the situation in NY was sternly rebuked by Bush, who said that now was not the time to be talking about it. And remember, that at this time, Bush knew that there was at least one more plane at large - something which no-one else in the class knew.
At 9.30, with AA 77 still flying unescorted towards DC, Bush finished the reading class (on schedule) and then wasted more time with a pointless speech to the nation, already promising to "hunt down and punish those responsible", while showing no interest in doing anything about the plane which was still at large, a danger of which his audience was unaware. He left the school about the same time that the Pentagon was hit.
Later, in an attempt to cover up the fact that he'd still gone to the school in spite of being aware of the crisis, Bush lied about his movements on the morning, inventing a story that he was already at the school when the first crash occurred. This lie has worked its way into the popular mythology in the mainstream media. In the scramble to find a cover story for his movements that morning, Bush also carelessly claimed that he'd seen the first crash live on TV at the school and had thought it was an accident. This is also a lie because the first crash was never broadcast live. No footage appeared until the following day.
Immediately after the attacks, US TV networks reported that investigators were looking into massive insider trading on airline stocks in the last few days before the attacks - indicating that the terrorists profited from foreknowledge of their actions. Then the story simply vanished from the mainstream media. Investigative and regulatory authorities could easily find out who placed those trades, but nearly three years later, there has been no investigation, no charges laid and deafening silence about the trades from both govt and media.
Although the govt claimed to be completely taken by surprise, it somehow had no trouble in naming the alleged perpetrator - Osama Bin Laden - within hours, and immediately threatened to invade Afghanistan. What they negelcted to mention was that the decision to invade Afghanistan had already been made by July 2001, and the specific war plans arrived on Bush's desk on sept 9.
It a common myth that Bin Laden has claimed responsibility for the attacks but this simply isn't true. He's vigorously denied any involvement .and according to some reports has condemned the attacks as un-Islamic. The myth of his confession is based entirely upon a video tape produced by the Pentagon which claims to show the bearded fiend laughing about how many innocent people he's killed. This tape is almost certainly a fake, and thePentagon's translation has been attacked by independent translators as misleading and incomplete. In response, the Pentagon effectively admitted as much, saying "it is not a verbatim translation of every word spoken at the meeeting, but it does convey the messages and the information flow." The Dept of defense defended the translation thus . " The translation is what it is .We never said it was a literal translation."
Incriminating as all of this is, it only scratches the surface. The FBI managed to name the 19 Arabs involved within a few days, and their names, faces and biographies were promptly splashed across the mainstream media. Supposedly, thier passports and suicide notes were found at the crash scenes in spite of fiery crashes which completely incinerated the planes - including the normally indestructible flight recorder boxes, and all the occupants.
In another miraculous stroke of good luck for the evidence hunters, the luggage of alleged ringleader, Mahommed Atta, was somehow left behind at Logan airport and just happened to contain instructions to his fellow conspirators. And it seems that they learned how to fly the giant Boeings at the last minute by reading flight manuals on the way to the airport - because they conveniently left the manuals - in Arabic of course - in the cars they had rented.
How emabarrassing for the FBI when the alleged hijackers started turning up alive, protesting their innocence! And even more embarrassing when the passanger lists provided by the airlines to CNN did not contain a single Arabic name. And none of the names on the passenger lists are alleged to be aliases for any of the Arabs. How did they get on the flights without being on the passenger lists, and if they were using false names, how were these traced to their real ID's and why have none of the other names on the lists ever been identified as hijackers' aliases? 19 obvioulsy Arabic men got on to planes with non Arabic false ID, with a 100% success rate? And why is there no airport security footage of them?
Within a few weeks of "identifying" the hijackers, the FBI was then forced to admit that they actually had no idea who the hijackers were. In spite of this, the same 19 names and faces have been splashed across the mainstream media unchanged, as if this admission had never been made. And in subsequent statements, the FBI buried this admission with an avalanche of increasingly ridiculous spin about the sinister pre-Sept 11 activities of the 19 Arabs, seemingly forgetting that they admitted these IDs to be ficticious.
For example, the FBI rather stupidly claimed that 9 of the ficticious Arabs had actually been searched before boarding because they looked suspicious. If they were using false names when they were searched, then surely the FBI must know which of those 9 people on the passenger lists were actually the hijackers incognito? Nope. And if they were not using false IDs, can we know why they're not on the passenger lists? Nope. Clearly, the 19 Arabs are complete fiction.
Some critical thinking about how the hijacking is supposed to have taken place also reveals the story as a bad cartoon script. In the event of a hijacking, the crew only has to punch in a four digit hijacking code - accessible from several different places - to alert ATC to a hijacking. So if 5 men were to try to take over a plane by the crude method of theatening people with boxcutters, while it might be possible for them to be able to gain control of the plane, to do so without ATC first receiving a distress code is almost impossible.
We are supposed to believe that they achieved the impossible 4 times out of 4. In one of the phone calls allegedly made from AA 11, it was said that the crew locked themselves in the cockpit, and the hijackers attempted to lure them out by shooting and stabbing passengers. This is said to have gone on for 25 minutes. Why then, no distress code from AA 11 ? Furthermore, the timeline of the alleged phone call indicates that the plane had already turned off course before the hijackers got into the cockpit!
But it wasn't only the hijackers which were fiction. So were the hijackings. We all think that we saw a big plane hit the WTC live on TV, so there must have been hijacked planes, right ? A closer look reveals it as an elaborate illusion. First, lets take AA77, the plane which is supposed to have hit the Pentagon. This is one of the most heavily surveillanced buildings in the world, and yet somehow they can't come up with any footage of the crash. Because it never happened. Something hit the pentagon but it was't a Boeing 757 or anything anwhere near that size.
Trash
hauled out of the Pentagon yielded NO seats, NO luggage, NO bodies; NO on-site
morgue was ever set up; no remains recovered--these were elements completely
missing from the Arlington County 255-page final report.
There are numerous photos of the aftermath and nowhere is to be seen any evidence of wreckage of such a plane. A 757 has a wingspan of 125 ft, a tail height of 40 ft and a length of 155 ft. The hole in the Pentagon wall was about 40 ft wide, 25 ft high and collpased only the first ring of the building - about 40 ft deep. There is no sign of any Boeing debris anywhere--no wings, no tail, no protruding fuselage. The tail couldn't fit through the hole even if the plane was sliding along the ground. And because the grass outside is smooth, green and undamaged, even that is impossible. And because the angle of entry of the mystery object was about 45 degrees, 125 wingspan would cause an impact about 180 ft wide. A giant aircraft has supposedly passed through a hole many times smaller than itself, without breaking off any parts, and then totally vanished.
Furthermore, official aviation records from the US bureau of trasportation say that the alleged AA 77 flight did not exist. The BT keeps a record of details about every flight ever scheduled from a US airport - even cancelled flights. No such record exists of AA 77 on Sept 11. Early reports said that the incident at the pentagon was caused by a truck bomb.
Now consider AA 11, the plane alleged to have hit the South tower at 8.45. This is not the plane shown in the dramatic, often replayed crash video, but the less frequently shown crash. Whatever the object is, it is certainly not a Boeing 767 or any kind of large passenger jet. When one views the video at full speed, one can only see a brief flash and then the explosion. Since we are always being told that its AA 11, the natural tendency is to think that its just too fast to see on the video. However a frame by frame analysis shows a fuzzy small, rather squat looking triangular shaped craft - nothing like a Boeing 767 and way too small, which divebombs into the tower in a manner which would appear to impossible for a large airliner. Neither is there a single witness report to a large jet. All early reports say that it was a small plane, and it only became a large plan, after American Airlines issued a statement saying that it had lost AA11 in the crash. The BT database also says that there was no such flight as AA 11 on Sept 11.
Now the Nth tower crash, the one shown live on TV. Surely this was a real Boeing 767 because we saw it live, and at superficial viewing it certainly appears to be a large jet. However, a frame by frame examination of the video reveals that it is not a 767 or any kind of conventional aircraft.
The anomalies are too many to go into in this article, but in summary it was defintely not UA 175. Furthermore, aviation records from the FAA show that although UA 175 existed as a flight, unlike AA 77 or AA 11, the plane to which this flight was assigned - N612UA - is still registered and valid. In other words, it never crashed. So we don't know where it went, but we do know that it didn't hit the WTC.
And finally UA 93 - alleged to have crashed in PA. Like UA 175, this was a bona fide flight, but the plane - N591UA is also still registered as valid. Interestingly, FAA records do show the planes to which AA11 and 77 were allegedly assigned - N334AA and N644AA as destroyed - but not until Jan 14 2002, when the FAA regulations state that the deregistration must be reported on the day that a plane is totally destroyed. So most likely these planes were ready for retirement and were taken away somewhere to be scrapped.
Now to the question of the collpase of the WTC towers.The official story that they collpased from fire and/or impact damge is a physical impossibility. Video of the event shows that the towers did not collpase - they exploded in mid air, and one can see clear evidence of explosive charges running down the buildings. There are numerous scientific studies which demonstrate that its impossible for them to have collpased in the pancaking manner cited in the official story.
Firstly, all of the concrete in the towers was totally pulverized into fine dust. The amount of energy needed to achieve this task is quantifiable, and so is the amount of potential energy availble in a gravitational collpase. Its insufficient to acheive this pulverization, which means that only an added input of energy (such as explosives) can balance the energy equation.
Secondly, a simple application of the laws of gravity demonstrate that the towers collpased in a time which was impossible had the top floors been smashing through the lower floors. Excluding air resistance, any object free falls at 9.81m/s sq, regardless of weight. An object dropped from the top of the WTC would have hit the ground in 9.2 secs ( a little longer for air resistance).
The towers supposedly collpased by the method of the top floors smashing through the lower floors, meaning that at each stage of the 110 storey collpase, the falling rubble would have its acceleration significantly slowed by this resistance. But the towers collapsed in 11 secs, virtually a free fall. Although there are too many variables to calculate the exact minimum time possible for a pancake collpase, it would have to be more than 20 seconds. A pancake collapse in 11 seconds is impossible under the law of gravity.
This proves that the entire structure was suddenly and simultaneously converted into a free falling collection of disconnected rubble, something only achieveable through the co-ordinated use of demolition explosives. There are also witness reports from firefighters who say that they heard bombs going off in the buildings. Furthermore, the media likes to gloss over the similarly neat, vertical, and lightening quick collpase of WTC building 7, a 47 storey building which was not hit by anything but also disappeared in a manner identical to that of a classic controlled demolition.
Apart from Sept 11, no steel framed skyscraper has ever totally collapsed from fire - and then we allegedly get 3 in one day. On Sept 14, a demolition expert who works for the Pentagon, professor Van Romero, obviously unaware of the political minefield into which he was stepping, said that upon his viewing of the collapse videos, he believed that it was a controlled demolition. Prof Romero later retracted his statement in mysterious circumstances, refusing to say why and refusing to offer any alternative scenario, simply saying that he wasn't prepared to say what did or didn't happen, and didn't want to talk about it anymore.
The early spin from the media was that the ferocious heat of the burning jet fuel melted the structural steel of the skyscraper. Unfortunately, jet fuel, which is basically kerosene, typically burns at at about 450 degrees C, and steel melts at about 1500C.
Scientific calculations of the maximum amount of heat which could have been even theoretically generated by the maximum amount of fuel that the mythical planes could have carrying show that it could not have contributed more than 280C to the temperature - even if all the fuel was confined to one floor. Each floor of the WTC was about 4,000 sq metres. The maximum amount of fuel which the plane could have carried was about 8000 gallons. So even claiming that all of this fuel burnt within one floor, thats about 2 gallons per sq metre - supposedly melting steel construction beams.
Neither does the myth of a ferocious fire in the WTC stand up to the scrutiny of witness or video evidence. Firefighter tapes describe some "isolated pockets of fire" which they could "knock out" with two hoses. And the black smoke drifting from the building indicates an oxygen starved fire.
Even if the mythical inferno were true, far more ferocious fires have been expericened in other skyscrapers - sometimes burning out of control for as long as 20 hours, and never has one of these buildings collpased.
Why would they want to demolish the WTC? It had been losing money for years. Its the most valuable piece of real estate in the world, but the buildings themselves were a disaster. Under- tenanted, beset by asbestos problems, the owner, the NY Port Authority had received warnings that it was sitting on a legal and financial timebomb. And of course, they couldn't be demolished because of all the asbestos dust that would go into the air of NY.
The NYPA had been trying to sell the buildings for years, and understandably, nobody was interested. In early 2001, the NYPA went to court in a test case, and tried to get its insurance company to pay for asbestos renovations. The case was thrown out. This should have made the buildings even more unsaleable. However, immediately after this, Manhattan property develepor Larry Silverstein, who sits on the board of Westfield America, stepped in with a consortium worth $US3.2 billion for a 99 year lease on the site. Westfield Australia directly contributed $A840 million for control of the shopping plaza. Silverstein insured himself for $US3.5 billion per terrorist attack, and Westfield fully insured itself against terrorism and loss of rental income. Immedaitely upon signing the deal, Westfield announced that it would double the rents, causing much scratching of heads in financial circles, since the buildings were already so under tenanted.
Silverstein, and Peter Lowy from Westfield were handed the keys in a take over ceremony on Sept 10, and the very next day, the troublesome things conveniently disappeared in a terrorist attack - along with building 7 of the complex - solving the asbestos problem, leaving Silverstein with a clean building site on the best real estate in the world, and Westfield with a rental income which would have been unsustainable in a real trading environment, and no law suits over all the asbestos dust released into the air of Manhattan. Silverstein's insurer has agreed to the $3.5 billion pay out, but Silverstein is claiming that it was two terrorist attacks and wants $ 7 billion, which is currently the subject of a court case.
Very early media reports had the two ficticious AA flights as the planes to hit the WTC. AA 77 was only switched to being the Pentagon plane hours later. UA 175 was the last plane to be "confirmed" as involved. At 9.17, the FAA started diverting all flights.
Early reports show wild discrepencies in terms of which allegedly hijacked plane went where. The ficticious AA77 is particularly volatile from one report to another, at one stage saying that it hit the WTC, then that it didn't even take off for a half hour after the second crash ,then that after taking off at 9.33, it somehow flew 700 miles out to Ohio and back, in just 5 minutes, to hit the Pentagon. One report had UA 93 landing at Cleveland due to a bomb scare. What is clear is that they were making it up as they went along, and the final cover story about which planes crashed where, didn't settle down for hours.
In summary, this is most likely how the morning of Sept 11 really played out. There was no need to issue an order for the air force to stand down routine intercept proceedures, because it appears that there actaully weren't any hijackings.
Two unconventional objects were fired into the WTC. The impacts were blamed on the two ficticious AA flights. At this time UA 93 and 175 were flying normally. Then the FAA begins diverting flights - including the two UA flights.
The BT database tells us of any flights which are diverted, but doesn't tell us where they are divereted to. So we don't have an official record of where the two UA flights landed. Later, AA 77 becomes the pentagon plane, and UA 175 becomes the Sth tower plane as the official cover story settles down. Thus of the four allegedly hijacked planes , two didn't exist, and the other two were diverted to safe landings somehow, while another fake plane crash was manufactured at the Pentagon. Most likely the PA crash was a drone craft of some kind, and there is evidence that the substitute craft was shot down.
This is only a brief summary of the evidence. Much material had to be left out due to space contraints. I encourage all readers to request by email, or read on line the documentation and full evidence kit for this summary.

http://www.reuters.com/locales/newsArticle.jsp?type=worldNews&locale=en_IN&storyID=4831774
http://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/evils/politics/X0002_BUSHED.TXT.html
ADDITIONAL NEWS RELEASES 2004
--US appoints bank executive to press China on floating currency
--China poised to join nuclear supplier group
--Cheney faces China's pressure on Taiwan: US presents 'evidence' ... Dick Cheney was pressured
over Taiwan in meetings with China's top leaders on Wednesday, while he presented them with new
intelligence on North Korea's nuclear ...
--Cheney presses Beijing on N Korea's nuclear arms Thursday, Apr 15, 2004: "The North Korean
crisis has simmered since October 2002, when US officials say Pyongyang disclosed it was working
on a clandestine nuclear weapons program. Washington says intelligence from A.Q. Khan, a Pakistani
scientist believed to have sold nuclear technology to North Korea as well as to Libya and Iran,
provides third-party confirmation that Pyongyang probably already has nuclear weapons. US
officials say they hope the information will end what they see as lingering Chinese doubts.
--"Any question about whether or not North Korea had a program based upon highly enriched
uranium has been pretty well resolved in our minds" following the breakup of the Khan network,
the official said. "We are confident they do have such a program."
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2004/04/15/2003136692
--A Dangerous Shield The 'missile' shield is a dual-usage EMF command and control grid - Zbin
http://militaryspecialtiesinc.com/images/US/USPhotoMagPaper/blottCBI.JPG
http://images.google.ca/images?q=tbn:YSUZ4MdkfvEJ:www.canalplus.fr/archives/courts/galerie/images/mao.jpg
http://mission.base.com/geometries/images/bush-mao-berlusconi-fullscreen.jpg
As a writer I do not have a set of words to describe what 142 Degrees in the shade is like. I've seen 120 D. in Phoenix and 110 D in the spa's sauna I use. One hundred forty-two degrees leaves me speechless. Try to imagine 142 D temperature while wearing a helmet, long sleeve shirt, long pants, a bullet proof vest, boots, and carrying a 70 pound pack.
By contrast the Inuit of Alaska and Canada have thirty-seven words to precisely talk about different kinds of snow.
So, since the temperature is heating up in Iraq it seemed like a good time to float this story to different Internet sites and news publications. There was one story in 2003 of one 19 year old British soldier whose military job was to work in a British tank. In Iraq. In the summer. Word is, from London, that he forgot to drink enough water and he literally cooked in his tank.
But, this story is not about the temperature in Iraq. You can bet, though, the weather will be really important for those Americans unfortunate enough to still be in Iraq this summer.
This story is about American weapons built with Uranium components for the business end of things. Just about all American bullets, 120 mm tank shells, missiles, dumb bombs, smart bombs, 500 and 2,000 pound bombs, cruise missiles, and anything else engineered to help our side in the war of us against them has Uranium in it. Lots of Uranium.
In the case of a cruise missile, as much as 800 pounds of the stuff. This article is about how much radioactive uranium our guys, representing us, the citizens of the United States, let fly in Iraq. Turns out they used about 4,000,000 pounds of the stuff, give or take. That is a bunch.s
Now, most people have no idea how much Four Million Pounds of anything is, much less of Uranium Dust (UD), which this stuff turns into when it is shot or exploded. Suffice it to say it is about equal to 1,333 cars that weigh three thousand pounds per car. That is a lot of cars; but, we can imagine what a parking lot with one thousand three hundred and thirty three cars is like. The point is: this was and is an industrial strength operation. It is still going on, too.
No sir-ee, putting Four Million Pounds of Radioactive Uranium Dust (RUD) on the ground in Iraq was a definitely "on-purpose" kind of thing. It was not "just an accident." We, the citizens of the United States, through our kids in the Army, did this on purpose.
When the uranium bullets, missiles, or bombs hit something or explode most of the radioactive uranium turns instantly to very, very small dust particles, too fine to even see. When US Troopers or Iraqis breathe even a tiny amount into their lungs, as little as One Gram, it is the same as getting an X-Ray every hour for the rest of their shortened life.
The uranium cannot be removed, there is no treatment, there is no cure. The uranium will long outlast the Veterans' and the Iraqis' bodies though; for, you see, it lasts virtually forever.
But, it gets worse. Seems an Admiral who is the former Chief of the Naval Staff of India wanted to know how much radiation this represented. He also wanted to express the amount in a figure that the world, especially the non American world, could easily understand.
The Admiral decided to figure out how many Nagasaki Atom Bombs it would take to deliver the equivalent of the total amount of radiation deployed in Iraq in 2003 in Four Million Pounds of uranium.
The Admiral also wanted to figure out how much radiation the United States Military Forces have deployed in the last Five American Wars, the so-called Five Nuclear Wars.
That is a simple enough task for somebody like the Naval Chief of Staff for a country that is a member of the Nuclear Club. Using the Nagasaki bomb for the measuring stick is a particularly gruesome twist, though. For those of you in the States who do not know it, the United States Military Forces dropped two nuclear Bombs on Japan at the close of World War II. The whole world remembers that.
One Atom Bomb was dropped by Americans on the city of Hiroshima, the other on the city of Nagasaki three days later. About 170,000 people were incinerated immediately. It was a really big deal.
It is a measuring stick that plays very well in the rest of the world; but, not very well on Fox News (Fair & Balanced) (c) or the rest of the Fox-like American media. The Department of Energy still lists the Hiroshima and Nagasaki detonations as "tests." The admiral released the data months ago at a scientific conference in India. This article is the first report of the data in the United States. It will first be released on the Internet.
The admiral in India calculated the number of radioactive atoms in the Nagasaki bomb and compared it with the number in the 4,000,000 pounds of uranium left in Iraq from the 2003 war. Now, believe me, it is a lot more complex than that; but, that is essentially what the experts in India did.
How many Nagasaki Nuclear Bombs equal the Radiation loosed in the 2003 Iraq war? Answer: About 250,000 Nuclear Bombs.
How many Nagasaki Nuclear Bombs equal the Radiation loosed in the last Five American Nuclear Wars? Answer: About 400,000 Nuclear Bombs.
Who would do something like this?
We would. The only people in the history of the world to engage in Nuclear Wars are Americans, citizens of the United States. Allegedly, the Germans and Japanese of WWII also wanted to engage in nuclear wars, except the American Military beat them to the draw, so to speak.
Respected academic scholars could debate forever whether or not Herr Hitler, Fuhrer of Germany, would have deployed uranium munitions in the Sudetenland if the weapons had been available. Certainly the Germans knew just as much about uranium wars as we did at the time. It seems doubtful that Adolph Hitler would have ordered the use of uranium munitions there because the Sudetenland was so close to the Fatherland, Nazi Germany.
An American General named Leslie Groves was in charge of the bomb making operation called The Manhattan Project. In 1943 The War Department knew exactly what uranium bullets and bombs were good for.
If the nuclear weapons did not detonate in Japan, the use of uranium bullets and bombs were the fall back position. It was not till Ronald Reagan was President in 1980 did the re-named Defense Department resurrect the deadly radioactive uranium bullets, bombs, and missiles. No wonder his popular nick-name was Ronnie Ray-Guns.
The American Military knew the symptoms of radiation poisoning in 1943 too; starting with the irritated sore throat through to an agonizing death from being cooked from the inside out.
President Bush promised to invade twelve countries in the 2003 State of the Union speech. I believe the man. For some reason, some misguided Americans do not believe him, or think he was "exaggerating." The rest of the world has every reason to believe him, though.
Not to worry, the President has plenty of raw material for radioactive uranium munitions left. There are more than 77,000 Tons stored at the 103 nuclear waste plants and the several Nuclear Weapons Labs in the US. Each one makes another 250 pounds of radioactive material a day for radioactive bullets, bombs, and missiles. Not to put too fine a point on it; but, that is enough for 40.5 more gloriously successful campaigns like the 2003 Nuclear War in Iraq.
Every year about this time the Southern winds leave a fine desert sand on the windshields of cars parked outside in Continental Europe and Britain. Soon this sand dust will carry a surprise. Thanks to the Americans. Thanks to us. We did this to the world. And, we wonder why they hate and despise us so.
These uranium weapons' indiscriminate killing effect gives a whole new meaning to the age old term: cannon fodder. In Iraq, what goes around, comes around. If not the uranium munitions themselves, the uranium dust will be in the bodies of our returning armed forces, time bombs slowly ticking away the lives of the gullible and the ignorant with their very own internal radiation source, the cannon fodder of the 21st Century American Nuclear Wars.
Put your ending to this article next.
A lot of people have done everything we can think of to stop these nuclear wars. Even more specifically to stop the use of uranium as a munition and shut down the nuclear power plants. We have tried and failed for years. Why don't you give it a try? Can't hurt anything! Write what steps you would take to turn this situation around. Contact me at: bobnichols@cox.net.
--- Bob Nichols writes in Oklahoma City and is the Editorial writer for DemoOkie.com. Bob Nichols is a contributing writer for LiberalSlant, Democratic Underground, OnlineJournal, AmericaHeldHostage, and other online dot com publications. Mr. Nichols is a frequent contributor to The Oklahoma Observer and other print publications. He lives and works in Oklahoma. He is a member of CASE -- Citizens' Action for Safe Energy, and President of the Carrie Dickerson Foundation. CASE has successfully killed two serious, well funded attempts to build Nuclear Power Plants in Oklahoma and several attempts to site what is now known as the "Yucca Mountain Reactor Dump" in Oklahoma. All these efforts to build nuclear facilities have failed. CASE won every time.
Copyright 2004, Bob Nichols. All rights reserved. Permission for reposting is allowed provided the complete text and attribution are kept intact.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5855.htm
~~ THE PEOPLE ~~
Versus
~~ GEORGE WALKER BUSH, President of the United States of America
Present: Presiding Judge Professor Osamu Niikura (Japan), Professor Dr. Asaho Mizushima (Japan), Professor Dr. R.I. Akroyd (England), Professor Peter Erlinder (USA), Professor Ms. Niloufer Bhagwat (India).
Judgement of Professor Ms Niloufer Bhagwat J.
QUOTE....I find the Defendant, George Walker Bush, President of the United States and
Commander-in-Chief of United States Armed Forces guilty --
1. Under Article 2 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan and under International Criminal Law, for waging a war of aggression against Afghanistan and the Afghan people ;
2.Under Article 3, Part I , clause (a) , (b), (c), (d), (f), (g) and Article 3, Part II, clause (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (h), (i), (k), (l), (n), (o), (p), (q) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan, under International Criminal Law and International Humanitarian Law, in respect of War Crimes committed against the people of Afghanistan by the use of weapons prohibited by the laws of warfare causing death and destruction to the Afghan people; maiming men, women and children;
3.Under Article 4, clause (a), (b), (d), (e), (f), (h) and (i) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal and International Humanitarian Law, for Crimes Against Humanity committed against the people of Afghanistan; resulting in inhumane acts affecting large sections of the population cause by the military invasion, bombing, and lack of humanitarian relief ;
4. Under Article 3, Part I , clause (a), (b), (c), (f), (g) and Article 3, Part II clause (f), (k), (p), and (q) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan, under International Criminal Law and the Hague Convention and Geneva Convention (III) of 1949 in respect of the torture and killings of Talban and other prisoners of war who had surrendered and their torture and inhumane conditions of detention and deportation of innocent civilians;
In respect of the transport of prisoners in sealed Containers and their death due to suffocation and filing of rifle shots at the Container for creating holes for ventilation with the prisoners inside; and for conditions at Sheberghan prison; the Defendant is entitled to benefit of doubt at this trial however the issues are left open for trial, before any other court /Tribunal; as the evidence before the Tribunal is not conclusive on the involvement of United States forces;
5. Under Article 3, Part I (c) and (g); Article 3 Part 2 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (h), (i), (l) and Article 4(b), (l) of (n), (p), (q) of the ICTA in respect of the serious humanitarian situation resulting from the refugee exodus in Afghanistan due to the bombing of civilian population and civilian infrastructure in a country already affected by serious famine resulting in mass exodus of people and death from bombing, hunger, displacement, disease; and absence of humanitarian relief;
6. Under Article 3, Part II, clause(o), (p) and under Article 4 clause (a),(b) and (l) of the statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan, and under International Criminal Law and International Humanitarian Law; in respect of the DU weapons used on the people of Afghanistan to exterminate the population; and for the crime of "Omnicide " the extermination of life, contamination of air, water and food resources; and the irreversible alteration of the genetic code of all living organisms including plant life ; as a direct consequence of the use of radioactive munitions in Afghanistan ; affecting countries in the entire region ;
7. Under Article 3, Part II, clause (o), (p) and under Article 4 (a) and ( i) of the Statute of the International Tribunal for Afghanistan , under International Criminal Law , for exposing soldiers and other personnel of the United States, UK and other soldiers of coalition forces to radioactive contamination by the use of DU weapons, hazarding their lives, their physiology , and that of their future progeny by irreversible alteration of the genetic code.
18. Direction :
1. THE DEFENDANT IS A CONVICTED WAR CRIMINAL CONSEQUENTLY UNFIT TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE; CITIZENS, SOLDIERS AND ALL CIVIL PERSONNEL OF THE UNITED STATES WOULD BE CONSTITUTIONALLY AND OTHERWISE JUSTIFIED IN WITHDRAWING ALL COOPERATION FROM THE DEFENDANT AND HIS GOVERNMENT; AND IN DECLINING TO OBEY ILLEGAL ORDERS OF THE DEFENDANT AND HIS ADMINISTRATION; INCLUDING MILITARY ORDERS THREATENING OTHER NATIONS OR THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES -- ON THE BASIS OF THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLE, THAT ILLEGAL ORDERS OF SUPERIORS MUST NOT BE OBEYED.
The following information has been provided by a citizen as a basis for further inquiry and examination:
"Dear Clifford,
I have been very curious as to whether or not the chemtrails have increased the death rate. I found it very difficult to get any official figures to compare from different years so I decided to do an informal check using the classified death listing archives from my local newspaper.
I was shocked at what I found. These figures are truly alarming. I compared the number of death notices for the same two months (Jan and Feb) going back for approx ten years (to compare pre chemtrails years with chemtrails years). This is what I found:
Year Death Notice Totals for Jan-Feb:
1995 .......... 191
1996 .......... 134
1997 .......... 105
1998 .......... 98
1999 .......... 144
2000 .......... 196
2001 .......... 1680
2002 .......... 1734
2003 .......... 1728
As you can see the totals for 2003 are almost 10 times higher than the totals for 1995. This seems way out of line and very alarming even taking into consideration an aging population. Perhaps there is another reason for these figures but I suspect it is a result of the chemtrails and what we are seeing may be the result of a deliberate depopulation campaign. These figures are from the San Francisco Chronicle death notice archives. For accuracy the actual newspaper archives should be doublechecked aginst the online archives because death notices that were originally listed in the newspaper are not necessarily included in the online archives. This is only done with the families permission.
Perhaps you could ask people in other communities to run this check to see what figures they come up with. I appreciate your efforts on behalf of the greater community. Best Regards,"
Anonymous by Request
When I saw the first ad on TV advertising collagen-enriched cosmetics I was speechless. We'll be apologizing to Hitler, I thought; at least he didn't kill for money!
Collagen is the gelatinous substance found in connective tissue, bone and cartilage. Nick Thimmesch's syndicated column, "Our Grisly Human Fetal Industry" documents that amniotic fluid and collagen can come from fetal material, since the Food and Drug Administration does not require pre-testing or the identification of cosmetic ingredients.
A glance through a local drug store revealed that the leading 12 shampoos and five hand creams all contained collagen. . Check your beauty products and you may be shocked! Unless your beauty product specifies animal collagen or bovine collagen, the product probably contains human collagen. The drug company should be challenged at once. Even collagen taken from a human placenta raises questions about respect of life and ownership of the placenta.
A letter from Mary Kay Cosmetics emphasizes that their collagen all comes from animals. A similar letter from Hask has also been received.
Since there are 1.5 million abortions every year, there is an abundant source of fetuses for commercial use.
There's triple profit to be had. The first is from the abortion
(estimated at a half billion dollars a year by Fortune magazine). The
second profit comes from the sale of aborted baby's bodies. The third
profit is from unsuspecting customers buying cosmetics. Babys' bodies
are sold by the bag, $25 a batch or up to $5500 a pound. The sale of
later-term elective abortions at D.C. General Hospital brought
R68,000 between 1966 and 1976. The money was used to buy a TV set and
cookies and soft drinks for visiting professors.
Call your local abortionry and hospital and ask them some pointed questions about the disposal and possible sale of fetuses. Would an abortionist who kills a baby think twice about selling its body? One prenatal killer said, "A baby is becoming property. We kill, keep or sell the property."
In the Pittsburgh Women's Health Service there's a sign in the lab areas asking doctors not to carry dead fetuses without wrapping them since it disturbs the patients.
Treated like trash--
What have abortionries done with fetuses in the past before they
realized that they could make another profit out of them? . Well,
"Richmond's shame" marked a new low in disposal of wastes. An abortion
center there filled a long bin on the rear of its property with the
remains of its day's nefarious doings. Its trash compactor neatly
mashed 100 baby's bodies which were then tied up in plastic bags and
thrown on top of the bin.
"The hungry dogs came along and dragged the bags away. There were frequent fights and the contents of the bags would be strewn up and down the streets until the dogs separated the gauze, sponges and pads and devoured the placenta, bones and flesh of the babies." said a mother. . She went to the police, health department and city hall and felt that she got nowhere: but the bags, of warm human baby's mutilated parts disappeared from the streets even though the clinic increased its abortions from 25 to 150 a week. They've since moved to larger quarters. . The Jacksonville, , Florida, Womens' Center for Reproductive Health, which is run and owned by the Clergy Consultation Service, advertises "celebrating a decade of service."
Nothing to Celebrate--
What they don't advertise is that they leave aborted babies out for
the trash pickup. Rev. Marvin Lutz, the director explained that the
practice of leaving the remains out was perfectly legal and approved
by the "good housekeeping" Judases, the National Abortion Federation
and the Florida Abortion Council.
Dr. Jeronimo Dominguez of New York wrote that "on any Monday you can see about 30 garbage bags with fetal material in them along the sidewalks of several abortion clinics in New York." . In Odessa, Texas, city ordinance 69-91 forbids placing a dead animal in a dumpster. But that didn't stop one abortionist from depositing large brown plastic bags full of sock like gauze bags into the city dumpster prior to closing every night.
A Baptist minister opened the bags and to his horror found a little "perfectly formed hands and feet of a 13-week old baby and the complete body, in pieces, of a 17-week old baby. Everything except one foot was there: the .rib cage, sexual organs, head, finger nails and toe nails." He nearly died of shock. I nearly did too, reading about it.
They Burn Babies, Don't They?--
Babies used to be burned on the altar to Baal; now they're burned in
furnaces at the sites of their deaths. . In Cincinnati, a prenatal
killer allowed dense smoke to emanate from his chimney. When firemen
were called they were told, "They're burning babies," as if that was
routine.
One wonders how life saving firemen could continue their dedication amid such a contradiction!
One pro-lifer overheard her children (ages five and seven) discussing the infamous picture of the babies in the trash can the first time they saw it. It's dolls, It has to be dolls," said the kindergartner. "No," said his pre-school sister, "it's babies." The older child couldn't believe it. "It has to be dolls," he insisted. "Why would anyone throw away babies?" When their mother explained to them that it was babies, both children grew very quiet. Silently they studied the picture and then recalled the times they had gone on trips to the city dump with the family. "Will the rats eat the babies when they take them to the dump?" the boy asked.
Animals Fare Better--
A wounded American eagle was found in Maryland recently and rushed
to emergency treatment but it was too late. He died. A $5000 reward
was offered for the arrest of its killer.
Similarly, the Izaak Walton League's ethics fund has spent nearly $60,000 in the last one and one half years to enhance outdoor ethics.
It is illegal to ship pregnant lobsters (regardless of which trimester!) to market. There's a $1000 fine and a year's jail term as a penalty. . The Massachusetts Supreme Court has ruled that goldfish cannot be awarded as prizes in games of chance. This violates the state's anti cruelty law to protect the "tendency to dull humanitarian feelings and corrupt the morals of those who observe them." This same court upheld mandatory state funding of abortions!
If the human fetus were an animal, its welfare might be entrusted to the Department of Agriculture or the Fish and Wildlife service where it would be safer than at the mercy of the Health Department. The hackles of the SPCA would rise at the physical treatment it received.
The New Laboratory Rat--
Some researchers insist that the reason they must do research on
human fetuses is because they are human, not animal. . In a
it-shouldn't-happen to a dog story, 47 senators voted in 1974 to
protect dogs from experimentation with poisonous gas but then voted
down Sen. Jess Helm's amendment to prevent federal funds from being
used for abortion. One liberal, pro-abortion Senator gave an emotion
laden speech to protect dogs. Man's best friend came out better than
man himself! . Who is pressing for the "right" to experiment? No one
less than the nation Institutes of Health. A stacked national
commission gave them the "right" and this experimentation is funded by
you, the taxpayer! . There is another sequel to the erosion of the
value of human life. Abortion, fetal experimentation, infanticide and
euthanasia are four walls of the same coffin.
Even Planned Parenthood's anti life lawyer Harriet Pilpel was shocked. "What mother (sic) would consent to an experiment on her fetus?" she asked.
A Few Choice Examples--
Some of the more shocking facts that will give you heart palpitations
include:
The Modern Scalp Display?--
And the atrocities go on. Will the unborn be regarded as handy little organ sources? Will our pre-born brothers and sisters become a source of spare body parts?
Listen to the newscasters - they are already pleading nationwide for organs. It's enough to make you tear up your organ donor card! At least adults can consent to being inventoried like a body shop's spare parts department but Little Bugger cannot!
After reading that aborted baby's fat is being used to make soap in England and the fact that the former head of the federal Centers for Disease Control abortion surveillance branch proposed that abortions should be charged for by the length of the baby's foot, are we surprised that babies are treated this way in the Year of the Child or the Year of the Disabled? . After reading the above, if your heart is still beating, run, don't walk, to your nearest prayer closet and start praying!
SYSOP's note: Everything you have just read is quite true. Dr. Fairfax has documentation and clippings to support every point made in this article. You may obtain a copy from her - Please send a donation with your request for the 10 pages to Dr. Olga Fairfax, 12105 Livingston St., Weaton, MD 20902. Olga Fairfax, Ph.D is director of Methodist United for Life.
Note: Attorneys and Judges play word games that a baby is not a human being, and that their flesh is not sold, but that this $billion industry runs on "donations" Once again, it is the courts protecting criminals that this operation exists. This is a BILLION $$ human flesh industry, not only in aborted child parts but in murdered and missing children as well, in an international child black market flesh trade. In the courts, and in the "legal" contracts these abortionists are using, they do not say they are trading in human flesh or body parts at all.
In the United States it is "AGAINST THE LAW", "illegal" to trade in human flesh. So, like with every other part of their criminal operation, they change the words. They say they "DONATING" "TISSUE" to the "University" for "RESEARCH" and that the BILLIONS $$ that changes hands both in open market and in black market is not called "profit" or "buying" but "fees" and "exchanges", etc. It is so unbelievable and amazing that they stand in courts and say these words but they in fact do. The same way they do not say a "baby" is aborted, it is a "fetus" and "property", etc.
These are the same "ethicists" and "scientists" who are now pushing nano-technology, calling it the "new future". The manipulation and exploitation we see here is just the beginning. We were told by a Senator that in the "Salmon statutes", created for "sustainability" and to make "legal" the same deceptions to steal and liquidate people, that the population level for a sustainable Oregon is 800,000 people. There are about 3 million here now.... this is just one state. On our site is a UN Global Wetlands Map and it shows how they intend to harvest the HUMANS OFF OUR PROPERTY..... the "state" is NOT the people anymore and most people do not yet see that paradigm. The courts are NOT the people, they are PRIVATE courts now where corporate interests are the only "entities" who have rights. This whole scheme involves all parts, both state and federal and global markets now.
IT IS A GAME, PEOPLE--A TOTAL GAME AND FACADE. THE WHOLE COURT CHARADE IS FAKE - PHONY - QUASI HUMANS IN QUASI COURTS OPERATING RACKETEERING OPERATIONS - REVENUE MOVING ONLY MOSTLY INTO THEIR OWN SPECIAL INTERESTS BANK ACCOUNTS, WHICH THE "BANKS" ARE THESE SAME PEOPLE...
The language game is the way BAR attorneys call lies and times "legal" in the courtroom and they continue their murder for profit operation, here in broad daylight and with full public knowledge. We have a guilty verdict in a court against the state network here of pedophiles and criminal black market child sellers and abusers - they are being protected eight years now by the FBI, the US Attorney office both federal and state - completely open knowledge to the executive branch, while the government increases the "laws" against the people.
I Stew Webb was held as a political Prisoner in 1992-1993, on false telephone death threat and harassment chargers against my former father in law Leonard Millman Bush Crime Family Boss Hog who owned Silverado Savings and Loan of Denver, where Neil Bush, George W. Bush's brother was a Director.
Those charges were dismissed with prejudice; this was to silence me.
While held as a Political Prisoner I was in the company of many Iran Contra Shadow Government Players and Drug Lords, including one of the Columbian Escobar Family Members who had been importing Narcotics for the Bush's for years. He suddenly was jailed and many of his family were killed when Shakley and Bush decided to take over the Columbia Drug Cartel Operations and cut the Columbians out of the Picture.
Bush Sr. has been notorious for never paying his Crime Syndicate members. Millman had laundered nearly 12 Trillion Dollars of Narcotics monies through Silverado Savings and Loan with Neal Bush over an 8 year span. This is a ton of money that bought up American Corporations and Wall Street Stock, including CITI Group aka as CITI Bank the Worlds largest Corporation, with Bush and Millman's CIA Council Norman Phillip Brownstein now Director. (CITI CORP is were the missing Enron Monies went, that is a story for later)
Brownstein further was a Director of MDC the parent of Silverado. Many of the Bush Crime Family Drug Runners which I was jailed with told me and supplied evidence that they were paid with Artificially created stock from Leonard Millman's Nation Brokerage Company a subsidiary company of MDC Holdings, Inc. 3600 Yosemite, Denver, Colorado.
MDC was the parent company of Silverado Savings. MDC owned National Brokerage, National Brokerage's subsidiary was Blinder Robinson, America's largest penny stock brokerage firm in Denver run by Meyer Blinder and Marty Greenberg who now head's AIG American Insurance General. AIG, and is vice president of The Council on Foreign Relations, a New World Order think tank and Organization bent on the destruction of America, the United States Constitution, and dictates what American's top Government Officials can and cannot do.
National brokerage would issue the fake stock for the smugglers to put up as collateral for the loans.
Neil Bush would make a loan from Silverado, with the stock pledged as collateral and a non recourse loan--meaning--if it were not paid, you the Tax Payer picked up the tab, which was exactly what happened and was designed this way to pay the drug runners.
This way The Bush Crime Family Boss Hogs made more money for the New
World Orders Gray Men's Empire. The Gray men are the 100 Knight Templars
International Bankers today, aka know as the Council of 13, Illuminate, etc,
George H. W. Bush and Leonard Millman both being each at the top 100. If
you will go to http://www.stewwebb.com see:
Federal Grand Jury Demand against the Bush Crime Family filed July 3, 2003
in Denver Federal Court by Stew Webb Federal Whistleblower, you will see a
Grand Jury Demand regarding Narcotics Trafficking and other Crimes that relate
to this story.
The Bush Crime Family today imports 90-95% of all Drugs/Narcotics into America, Heroin from China, Cocaine from Columbia, Hashish from Pakistan, Marijuana from Belize (involving Congressman Porter Goss of Florida and Leonard Millman), a little known country of the east coast of Mexico; cocaine and pot from Guadalajara, Mexico; cocaine from Jamaica involving the infamous Smatt Brothers, Florida Governor Jeb Bush's good buddies; and Narcotics from Afghanistan, and many other countries too numerous to mention.
We are talking about Trillions of Dollars over the 50 plus years
George H. W. Bush, Henry Kissisnger and others have profited off the backs
of those American's who are hooked on Narcotics.
~~WAR PROFITEERING WASTES US ALL~~

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11938
NOTE: Joseph Goebbels, 1943:
QUOTE: So total war is the demand of the hour. We must put an end to the bourgeois
attitude which we have also seen in this war: Wash my back, but don't get me wet!
The danger facing us is enormous. The efforts we take to meet it must be just as
enormous. The time has come to remove the gloves! We must use our fists now! There
is no excuse for only superficially and carelessly making use of the war potential
at home and throughout Europe. We must use the full resources, as quickly and
thoroughly as it is organizationally and practically possible. Unnecessary concern
is wholly out of place. The future of Europe hangs on our success in the East!
We are ready to defend it! The German people are shedding their most valuable
blood in this battle. The rest of Europe should at least work to support us. Those
who do not understand this fight today will thank us on bended knee tomorrow that
we took it! -- UNQUOTE Joseph Goebbels, 1943
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb36.htm

December 16, 2003—Many observers were surprised last week when George W. Bush came down in favor of the People's Republic of China, against a democratic referendum in Taiwan. His weighing in on behalf of mainland China becomes more questionable at a time when well- connected Chinese companies are funneling large sums of money to Bush's brothers.
News reports reveal that Shanghai-based Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing, a multi- billion-dollar company co-founded by a son of China's former president, has presidential brother Neil Bush under a $2 million contract.
With no background in semiconductors, Neil Mallon Bush, third brother in the family, got a five-year contract from Grace, involving an annual retainer of $400,000 in stock. The arrangement is disclosed in court papers in Mr. Bush's scandal-ridden divorce. The business press has conjectured that Grace hoped to influence US limits on exporting sensitive technology to China.
An even bigger Chinese company recently moved in ways that benefit youngest Bush brother Marvin P. Bush. The company is Hong Kong-based Cheung Kong Holdings, a gargantuan real estate and investment conglomerate now branching into biotechs. According to the company, "combined market capitalization of the Cheung Kong Group amounts to HK$515 billion," or "approximately 11.5 percent of the total market capitalization of the Hong Kong stock market."
Cheung Kong's portfolio now includes Critical Path, Inc., a California-based software and Internet-messaging services company that lost money for the first nine months of this year. The company's SEC filings list as a significant shareholder Mr. Purnendu Chatterjee, acting for Winston Partners LP, a company co-founded by Marvin P. Bush. Recent filings show that Chatterjee's group including Winston Partners owns about 5.5 million shares in Critical Path (6.82 percent). Cheung Kong already owned substantial shares in Critical Path in December 2001. Its backing can only solidify the net worth of Critical Path, which has faced class action litigation and has changed top managers a couple of times in the past three years.
It thus cannot but help boost Winston Partners, a private investment firm in northern Virginia formed by Bush with longtime business associate A. Scott Andrews.
There is no law forbidding a foreign corporation from investing in an American company just because a president's relatives hold financial intere